C_NCENTRATE

Focused on the emerging side of things; technologies, territories, tools, strategies and ideas. Written by TBD Group (intelligence products, advisory, and events).

The next TNN is…‘The Future of…OPENAI + BIG TECH’ with Bloomberg’s Parmy Olson, September 19th, 8am, London. It’s time to get real about OpenAI and pals.
A few places left - book your place here / TBD+ members go free, join here.

A LEGALLY CHALLENGING WEEK IN BIG TECH

Big tech found itself in dicey waters this week with several cases that could profoundly alter the landscape for everyone. X is now banned in Brazil, Telegram’s CEO was arrested, TikTok has put Section 230 back in the spotlight and Yelp is mad at Google. The legal challenges facing Big Tech here are not merely skirmishes—they are seismic events that could redefine the rules of engagement for the entire sector.

First, let’s talk about Space Karen’s spat with Brazil. X was temporarily banned in Brazil following an order by the Brazilian Supreme Court, which stemmed from Musk’s refusal to appoint a legal representative in the country, a requirement under Brazilian law. The move was part of a broader crackdown on social media platforms during the country’s 2022 elections, where misinformation and harmful content became significant concerns. The ban on X highlighted the growing tension between governments and social media companies, particularly around issues of compliance with local laws and the moderation of content not just in Latin America but around the world as the right surges. The lesson here? Consequences for defying national regulations pushes people into corners. While there are a LOT of factors and issues to unpack here it was not the only giant legal issue this week, but does show the big issue here - the increasing scrutiny over how tech giants wield their power.

Moving on, Yelp is mad at Google, saying the search giant manipulated its dominance in general search to gain an unfair advantage in local search markets, encapsulates the growing distrust in Big Tech’s monopolistic tendencies. The case could set a precedent that might finally curb the unchecked growth of such platforms and companies, forcing them to reconsider their strategies in local and niche markets.

TikTok’s legal woes around Section 230—stemming from a lawsuit over a child’s death linked to its platform—signal a potential unraveling of the protective shield that has long safeguarded social media companies from liability for user-generated content. A HUGE deal. If Section 230 is weakened, the ripple effects would be immense, possibly leading to a more regulated internet where platforms are held accountable for content in ways they have never been before. Such a situation could lead to stricter content moderation policies, stifling the freewheeling nature of platforms that have thrived on user-driven content. Suffice to say, Zuck and pals aren’t thrilled and continue to reinforce their bunkers.

The biggest news of the week may have been the case of Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram, who faces charges in France for allegedly facilitating criminal activity on his platform, further highlights the tension between privacy and security . As governments worldwide intensify their scrutiny, the balance between upholding user privacy and ensuring security is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. This legal pressure may force platforms to re-evaluate their encryption policies, potentially leading to compromises that could erode the very foundation of user trust.

SO WHAT?